<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (3) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157531</link>
    <description>Supervening facts may be considered in eviction litigation where they materially affect the right to relief, even if they arise after institution of proceedings, provided fairness to both sides is preserved. The court&#039;s power to mould relief is not confined to the trial stage and extends to appellate and revisional proceedings, because an appeal is treated as a rehearing. Later acquisition of alternative non-residential accommodation by the landlord was therefore relevant to the statutory requirement under Section 10(3)(iii), and the High Court was entitled to take that development into account. The appeal was partly allowed and the relief was correspondingly modified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (3) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157531</link>
      <description>Supervening facts may be considered in eviction litigation where they materially affect the right to relief, even if they arise after institution of proceedings, provided fairness to both sides is preserved. The court&#039;s power to mould relief is not confined to the trial stage and extends to appellate and revisional proceedings, because an appeal is treated as a rehearing. Later acquisition of alternative non-residential accommodation by the landlord was therefore relevant to the statutory requirement under Section 10(3)(iii), and the High Court was entitled to take that development into account. The appeal was partly allowed and the relief was correspondingly modified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>