https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157529 The constitutional validity and enforceability of section 25-B of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, and the deduction mechanism under section 26(2) read with the notification for works contracts were upheld. The petitioners challenged the contractor deduction from running bills and argued that the provisions exceeded State legislative competence, but the Court found those objections meritless because identical challenges to the same provisions had already been rejected in an earlier decision. The writ petition was therefore dismissed and the statutory deduction scheme sustained. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:03:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157529 The constitutional validity and enforceability of section 25-B of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, and the deduction mechanism under section 26(2) read with the notification for works contracts were upheld. The petitioners challenged the contractor deduction from running bills and argued that the provisions exceeded State legislative competence, but the Court found those objections meritless because identical challenges to the same provisions had already been rejected in an earlier decision. The writ petition was therefore dismissed and the statutory deduction scheme sustained. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157529