https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157527 The High Court erred in proceeding on the assumption that the application for additional evidence had not been dealt with, because the application had not been pressed before the Charity Commissioner and there was no occasion for any order on it; the materials sought to be produced could not therefore be treated as wrongly ignored. On the statutory and factual position arising from later events, the Court held that relief could be moulded, but not so as to defeat vested statutory rights. The dispute was remanded to the prescribed appellate authority to decide the eligibility of the 38 persons first and then conduct a fresh election under the substituted regime. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 22:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157527 The High Court erred in proceeding on the assumption that the application for additional evidence had not been dealt with, because the application had not been pressed before the Charity Commissioner and there was no occasion for any order on it; the materials sought to be produced could not therefore be treated as wrongly ignored. On the statutory and factual position arising from later events, the Court held that relief could be moulded, but not so as to defeat vested statutory rights. The dispute was remanded to the prescribed appellate authority to decide the eligibility of the 38 persons first and then conduct a fresh election under the substituted regime. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157527