<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 257 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157523</link>
    <description>Stay against tax recovery should be assessed on settled factors of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and comparative injury, and a brief order is sufficient if it shows application of mind. Repeated adjournments do not by themselves establish adequate opportunity where the assessee says further declaration forms may materially affect the demand; additional forms may be received if justified. Fair appellate adjudication may also require verification of records at branch premises where the volume and nature of documents warrant it. The appellate authority was therefore permitted to consider branch inspection and was directed to hear and decide the pending appeal and related reassessment matters expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 257 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157523</link>
      <description>Stay against tax recovery should be assessed on settled factors of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and comparative injury, and a brief order is sufficient if it shows application of mind. Repeated adjournments do not by themselves establish adequate opportunity where the assessee says further declaration forms may materially affect the demand; additional forms may be received if justified. Fair appellate adjudication may also require verification of records at branch premises where the volume and nature of documents warrant it. The appellate authority was therefore permitted to consider branch inspection and was directed to hear and decide the pending appeal and related reassessment matters expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>