<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 361 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157493</link>
    <description>A remand order directing fresh factual inquiry on the nature of goods, without finally deciding the tax classification dispute or any question of law, is not revisable under a jurisdiction limited to erroneous or omitted legal determinations. The Tribunal had merely set aside the assessment and remitted the matter for fresh findings on evidence, so the order did not itself determine the rate of tax. The revision was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 361 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157493</link>
      <description>A remand order directing fresh factual inquiry on the nature of goods, without finally deciding the tax classification dispute or any question of law, is not revisable under a jurisdiction limited to erroneous or omitted legal determinations. The Tribunal had merely set aside the assessment and remitted the matter for fresh findings on evidence, so the order did not itself determine the rate of tax. The revision was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>