<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 538 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157475</link>
    <description>A judicial order obtained by fraud or wilful suppression of material facts is a nullity and may be examined in collateral proceedings. The power to quash an FIR must be exercised sparingly, and allegations of criminal conspiracy, corruption and cheating must be tested on the FIR&#039;s own contents rather than rejected simply because the supply followed earlier court directions. The prior ruling was confined to the Coal Controller&#039;s authority to vary contractual allotments and did not decide whether the company had breached its obligations or suppressed material facts. The FIR therefore disclosed matters requiring investigation and was not fit for quashing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 538 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157475</link>
      <description>A judicial order obtained by fraud or wilful suppression of material facts is a nullity and may be examined in collateral proceedings. The power to quash an FIR must be exercised sparingly, and allegations of criminal conspiracy, corruption and cheating must be tested on the FIR&#039;s own contents rather than rejected simply because the supply followed earlier court directions. The prior ruling was confined to the Coal Controller&#039;s authority to vary contractual allotments and did not decide whether the company had breached its obligations or suppressed material facts. The FIR therefore disclosed matters requiring investigation and was not fit for quashing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>