<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 248 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157470</link>
    <description>Appellate tax proceedings may entertain belated &#039;C&#039; forms as additional evidence where the assessee shows sufficient cause for not producing them before the assessing authority. The appellate power under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was treated as wide and co-extensive with assessment powers, and an appeal was regarded as a continuation of assessment proceedings. Section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and rule 12(7) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 require ordinary production before assessment, but they do not create an absolute bar to later consideration. The Tribunal must first decide sufficient cause before rejecting the forms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 18:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 248 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157470</link>
      <description>Appellate tax proceedings may entertain belated &#039;C&#039; forms as additional evidence where the assessee shows sufficient cause for not producing them before the assessing authority. The appellate power under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was treated as wide and co-extensive with assessment powers, and an appeal was regarded as a continuation of assessment proceedings. Section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and rule 12(7) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 require ordinary production before assessment, but they do not create an absolute bar to later consideration. The Tribunal must first decide sufficient cause before rejecting the forms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>