<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 290 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157444</link>
    <description>After the Forty-sixth Amendment, supply of food and drinks in hotels, restaurants and eating houses is treated as a deemed sale under Article 366(29A)(f), and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was read consistently with that constitutional expansion, so the levy of sales tax was sustained. Section 3 was considered sufficient to support the tax, and no separate charging provision or bifurcation of a service element was required because the entire transaction fell within the expanded concept of sale. The cancellation of a later exemption notification did not revive an earlier superseded exemption notification in the absence of express revival.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 16:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 290 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157444</link>
      <description>After the Forty-sixth Amendment, supply of food and drinks in hotels, restaurants and eating houses is treated as a deemed sale under Article 366(29A)(f), and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was read consistently with that constitutional expansion, so the levy of sales tax was sustained. Section 3 was considered sufficient to support the tax, and no separate charging provision or bifurcation of a service element was required because the entire transaction fell within the expanded concept of sale. The cancellation of a later exemption notification did not revive an earlier superseded exemption notification in the absence of express revival.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>