<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157429</link>
    <description>Section 54 of the Mysore Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 conferred only a limited power of control over the conduct of a society&#039;s business, not a power of supersession. Notifications that displaced the entire committee of management, removed the President and Vice-President, and replaced them with a new body exceeded that power and were ultra vires, especially because the Act provided a separate supersession mechanism under section 30. The action also bypassed the notice and opportunity contemplated by that scheme, rendering it arbitrary and contrary to natural justice. The result was that the notifications were unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157429</link>
      <description>Section 54 of the Mysore Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 conferred only a limited power of control over the conduct of a society&#039;s business, not a power of supersession. Notifications that displaced the entire committee of management, removed the President and Vice-President, and replaced them with a new body exceeded that power and were ultra vires, especially because the Act provided a separate supersession mechanism under section 30. The action also bypassed the notice and opportunity contemplated by that scheme, rendering it arbitrary and contrary to natural justice. The result was that the notifications were unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>