<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 291 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157404</link>
    <description>A later general recruitment rule under Article 309 did not automatically displace special recruitment rules governing the Motor Vehicles Branch, because the general scheme expressly saved matters otherwise provided by law and contemplated use of special rules for recruitment methods and qualifications. The special rules required promotion by selection to the post of Deputy Commissioner of Transport from eligible Regional Transport Officers, and the later insertion of Rule 3(2), though framed in non obstante language, was not treated as showing a clear intention to repeal or supersede that special regime. The governing principle stated was that a later general provision yields to an earlier special provision unless there is clear inconsistency or express override.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 291 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157404</link>
      <description>A later general recruitment rule under Article 309 did not automatically displace special recruitment rules governing the Motor Vehicles Branch, because the general scheme expressly saved matters otherwise provided by law and contemplated use of special rules for recruitment methods and qualifications. The special rules required promotion by selection to the post of Deputy Commissioner of Transport from eligible Regional Transport Officers, and the later insertion of Rule 3(2), though framed in non obstante language, was not treated as showing a clear intention to repeal or supersede that special regime. The governing principle stated was that a later general provision yields to an earlier special provision unless there is clear inconsistency or express override.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>