https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157396 The text applies the dominant nature test under the Industrial Disputes Act to hold that a Forest Department scheme with recreational and educational objectives was not an inalienable sovereign function and remained within industrial law scrutiny. It further construes item 6 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra labour law to infer unfair labour practice where workmen are kept as casuals for years to deny permanent status and benefits. On that footing, long and continuous service supported permanency and regularisation, and the Industrial Court's relief was upheld. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157396 The text applies the dominant nature test under the Industrial Disputes Act to hold that a Forest Department scheme with recreational and educational objectives was not an inalienable sovereign function and remained within industrial law scrutiny. It further construes item 6 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra labour law to infer unfair labour practice where workmen are kept as casuals for years to deny permanent status and benefits. On that footing, long and continuous service supported permanency and regularisation, and the Industrial Court's relief was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157396