<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 199 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157390</link>
    <description>A constitutional challenge under Article 14 to the classification in section 14(i)(iii) of the Central Sales Tax Act was rejected because such a contention must be specifically pleaded and proved. As no Article 14 plea was raised in the original petitions and the issue was neither pleaded nor argued before the Single Judge, the appellate court refused to entertain the new ground in writ appeal. The result was that the constitutional objection was not considered at the appellate stage and the writ appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 199 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157390</link>
      <description>A constitutional challenge under Article 14 to the classification in section 14(i)(iii) of the Central Sales Tax Act was rejected because such a contention must be specifically pleaded and proved. As no Article 14 plea was raised in the original petitions and the issue was neither pleaded nor argued before the Single Judge, the appellate court refused to entertain the new ground in writ appeal. The result was that the constitutional objection was not considered at the appellate stage and the writ appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>