<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 358 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157377</link>
    <description>Rule 44-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, read with section 20 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, recognises the Commissioner&#039;s revisional power over appellate orders under section 19, but only within a structured legal process. The Commissioner must first form a prima facie view that the order is prejudicial to the interests of revenue, issue notice, and then decide the matter on merits after hearing the affected party. The revisional power is therefore confined to a lawful merits-based examination and cannot operate as an automatic mechanism to nullify every appellate order in favour of the assessee. The rule and revisional scheme were treated as valid, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 358 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157377</link>
      <description>Rule 44-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, read with section 20 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, recognises the Commissioner&#039;s revisional power over appellate orders under section 19, but only within a structured legal process. The Commissioner must first form a prima facie view that the order is prejudicial to the interests of revenue, issue notice, and then decide the matter on merits after hearing the affected party. The revisional power is therefore confined to a lawful merits-based examination and cannot operate as an automatic mechanism to nullify every appellate order in favour of the assessee. The rule and revisional scheme were treated as valid, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>