<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (4) TMI 195 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157348</link>
    <description>The employee remained governed by the earlier service conditions because the Board had provisionally taken the employees at its disposal without framing new grades or altered conditions, and employees similarly placed had been treated as permanent and promoted; he was therefore entitled to equal consideration for promotion. The expression &quot;other authorities&quot; in Article 12 was held to be of wide amplitude and not confined by ejusdem generis, covering statutory bodies vested with public powers. As the Board was created by statute, exercised public control and issued enforceable directions, it fell within Article 12 and was subject to Part III, including Articles 14 and 16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (4) TMI 195 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157348</link>
      <description>The employee remained governed by the earlier service conditions because the Board had provisionally taken the employees at its disposal without framing new grades or altered conditions, and employees similarly placed had been treated as permanent and promoted; he was therefore entitled to equal consideration for promotion. The expression &quot;other authorities&quot; in Article 12 was held to be of wide amplitude and not confined by ejusdem generis, covering statutory bodies vested with public powers. As the Board was created by statute, exercised public control and issued enforceable directions, it fell within Article 12 and was subject to Part III, including Articles 14 and 16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>