<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157339</link>
    <description>A society is a State or other authority under Article 12 only where the Government exercises deep and pervasive financial, functional and administrative control. On the facts, the State Council of Education, Research and Training had administrative autonomy, managed its own finances once available, and was not under pervasive governmental domination, so it was not a State or other authority. As a result, writ directions requiring implementation of the unamended service regulation and related service benefits could not be sustained. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s directions, and dismissed the writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157339</link>
      <description>A society is a State or other authority under Article 12 only where the Government exercises deep and pervasive financial, functional and administrative control. On the facts, the State Council of Education, Research and Training had administrative autonomy, managed its own finances once available, and was not under pervasive governmental domination, so it was not a State or other authority. As a result, writ directions requiring implementation of the unamended service regulation and related service benefits could not be sustained. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s directions, and dismissed the writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>