<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 308 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157338</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court&#039;s later declaration that wheat and wheat products are different commodities under Article 141 bound pending assessment proceedings and displaced the earlier High Court view, so the contrary prospective-effect argument failed. A departmental circular issued on the basis of that earlier view lost its foundation once the Supreme Court ruled differently and could not override the law declared by the Supreme Court. Revisional jurisdiction was also upheld because the character of an order is fixed by the office held when it is made; an order passed by an Assistant Commissioner did not change into a Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order after promotion. The common challenge was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 308 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157338</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court&#039;s later declaration that wheat and wheat products are different commodities under Article 141 bound pending assessment proceedings and displaced the earlier High Court view, so the contrary prospective-effect argument failed. A departmental circular issued on the basis of that earlier view lost its foundation once the Supreme Court ruled differently and could not override the law declared by the Supreme Court. Revisional jurisdiction was also upheld because the character of an order is fixed by the office held when it is made; an order passed by an Assistant Commissioner did not change into a Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order after promotion. The common challenge was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>