https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157335 An efficacious statutory alternative remedy can justify refusal of writ relief under Article 226, particularly where the challenge is brought after considerable delay and no sufficient ground for discretionary interference is shown. The text also states that review jurisdiction is narrow: it cannot be used to reappraise the same facts or rehear the merits unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record. On that basis, the writ challenge was not entertained and the review application was held to be outside the permissible scope of review. en-us Wed, 18 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:51:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157335 An efficacious statutory alternative remedy can justify refusal of writ relief under Article 226, particularly where the challenge is brought after considerable delay and no sufficient ground for discretionary interference is shown. The text also states that review jurisdiction is narrow: it cannot be used to reappraise the same facts or rehear the merits unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record. On that basis, the writ challenge was not entertained and the review application was held to be outside the permissible scope of review. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157335