<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 521 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157333</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Corporation qualifies as a &quot;State&quot; under Article 12 of the Constitution of India due to its deep and pervasive state control. Consequently, the Corporation is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The appeal was allowed, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the case was remitted for a decision on the merits, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 521 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157333</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Corporation qualifies as a &quot;State&quot; under Article 12 of the Constitution of India due to its deep and pervasive state control. Consequently, the Corporation is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The appeal was allowed, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the case was remitted for a decision on the merits, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>