https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157322 Section 14 of the Limitation Act permits exclusion of time spent pursuing writ proceedings when the claimant acted diligently and in good faith, the writ remedy was declined because a civil action was appropriate, and the claimant was expressly relegated to that remedy. Refusal of discretionary relief under Article 226 does not leave the claimant without recourse where the underlying claim is recoverable through a civil suit. The claimant may issue notice to the Municipality and institute a civil suit, excluding the period spent before the High Court and Supreme Court in computing limitation. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:49:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157322 Section 14 of the Limitation Act permits exclusion of time spent pursuing writ proceedings when the claimant acted diligently and in good faith, the writ remedy was declined because a civil action was appropriate, and the claimant was expressly relegated to that remedy. Refusal of discretionary relief under Article 226 does not leave the claimant without recourse where the underlying claim is recoverable through a civil suit. The claimant may issue notice to the Municipality and institute a civil suit, excluding the period spent before the High Court and Supreme Court in computing limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157322