<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (4) TMI 95 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157308</link>
    <description>An appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure lies from a decree or an appealable order, not from a mere adverse finding recorded in a judgment. The Supreme Court held that the sons&#039; memorandum of appeal, which challenged only the finding that the partition was sham and colourable, was not maintainable because no appeal had been directed against the decree itself. It further held that the partition finding was unnecessary to the decree, did not operate as res judicata, and could not be used to sustain a late amendment of the appeal memorandum filed without explanation or condonation. The High Court&#039;s decision was set aside and the trial court&#039;s decree restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (4) TMI 95 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157308</link>
      <description>An appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure lies from a decree or an appealable order, not from a mere adverse finding recorded in a judgment. The Supreme Court held that the sons&#039; memorandum of appeal, which challenged only the finding that the partition was sham and colourable, was not maintainable because no appeal had been directed against the decree itself. It further held that the partition finding was unnecessary to the decree, did not operate as res judicata, and could not be used to sustain a late amendment of the appeal memorandum filed without explanation or condonation. The High Court&#039;s decision was set aside and the trial court&#039;s decree restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>