<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157296</link>
    <description>Under a special acquisition statute that applies the Land Acquisition Act only so far as applicable, compensation is valued by reference to the special preliminary notification date where the special procedure replaces the section 4(1) stage of the general Act. The text also states that a judgment concerning nearby acquired land is not automatically admissible as additional evidence in appeal; Order 41 Rule 27 requires recorded reasons showing necessity or substantial cause, and the other side must have an opportunity to rebut the material. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the existing evidence and admissibility of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157296</link>
      <description>Under a special acquisition statute that applies the Land Acquisition Act only so far as applicable, compensation is valued by reference to the special preliminary notification date where the special procedure replaces the section 4(1) stage of the general Act. The text also states that a judgment concerning nearby acquired land is not automatically admissible as additional evidence in appeal; Order 41 Rule 27 requires recorded reasons showing necessity or substantial cause, and the other side must have an opportunity to rebut the material. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the existing evidence and admissibility of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>