<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 327 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157286</link>
    <description>Restaurant and eating-house supplies of food are taxable where the dominant object of the transaction is sale, because the transitional exemption under section 6(2)(a) of the Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1982 applies only to service-based transactions and only where no tax was collected. The assessing authority must examine the true nature of the transaction when exemption is claimed, since the dominant-object inquiry determines whether the transaction falls within the tax net. The assessee seeking the exemption bears the burden of proving both that the supply was a service transaction and that tax was not in fact collected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 327 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157286</link>
      <description>Restaurant and eating-house supplies of food are taxable where the dominant object of the transaction is sale, because the transitional exemption under section 6(2)(a) of the Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1982 applies only to service-based transactions and only where no tax was collected. The assessing authority must examine the true nature of the transaction when exemption is claimed, since the dominant-object inquiry determines whether the transaction falls within the tax net. The assessee seeking the exemption bears the burden of proving both that the supply was a service transaction and that tax was not in fact collected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>