<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 350 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157279</link>
    <description>Under a beneficial sales tax incentive scheme for newly established industries, procedural requirements were construed liberally where the original application had been filed in time but was returned for defects. The later delay was not treated as fatal because the defect-related refiling was supported by sufficient cause and the scheme was intended to grant a tax concession. The claim was therefore required to be considered on merits, in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 350 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157279</link>
      <description>Under a beneficial sales tax incentive scheme for newly established industries, procedural requirements were construed liberally where the original application had been filed in time but was returned for defects. The later delay was not treated as fatal because the defect-related refiling was supported by sufficient cause and the scheme was intended to grant a tax concession. The claim was therefore required to be considered on merits, in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>