https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157222 A voter's right to receive material information about contesting candidates was treated as part of Article 19(1)(a), distinct from the general right to information about public affairs. Section 33B of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was criticised for imposing a blanket bar on further disclosures and was considered constitutionally unsustainable. The disclosure regime under Sections 33A and 75A was described as only partly adequate: criminal antecedents required fuller disclosure where cognizance had been taken, assets and liabilities had to be disclosed at the nomination stage, and educational qualifications were not treated as essential to the constitutional right to know. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jun 2014 23:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157222 A voter's right to receive material information about contesting candidates was treated as part of Article 19(1)(a), distinct from the general right to information about public affairs. Section 33B of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was criticised for imposing a blanket bar on further disclosures and was considered constitutionally unsustainable. The disclosure regime under Sections 33A and 75A was described as only partly adequate: criminal antecedents required fuller disclosure where cognizance had been taken, assets and liabilities had to be disclosed at the nomination stage, and educational qualifications were not treated as essential to the constitutional right to know. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157222