https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157214 The Bombay HC held that the Sales Tax Tribunal had no jurisdiction to stay recovery of assessed tax and penalty while a reference application under section 61 was pending, because section 61(6) expressly barred any stay of payment due under the Tribunal's order. Inherent or incidental powers could not be used to override that statutory prohibition, and the reference proceedings did not preserve any residual power to grant stay. The refusal of stay was therefore justified, and the writ petition failed. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:31:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157214 The Bombay HC held that the Sales Tax Tribunal had no jurisdiction to stay recovery of assessed tax and penalty while a reference application under section 61 was pending, because section 61(6) expressly barred any stay of payment due under the Tribunal's order. Inherent or incidental powers could not be used to override that statutory prohibition, and the reference proceedings did not preserve any residual power to grant stay. The refusal of stay was therefore justified, and the writ petition failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 26 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157214