<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 256 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157178</link>
    <description>Best-judgment turnover assessments for 1982-83 and 1983-84 were upheld where the assessee failed to maintain proper books and the estimating authority relied on disclosed expenditure and related outgoings without any jurisdictional error in the method adopted. Withdrawal of composition benefit for 1984-85 could not be sustained because cancellation under the sales tax rules required an independent finding of contravention on fresh material; reliance only on the inspection report, after the alleged offence had already been compounded under section 31, was insufficient. The consequential penalty resting on the same basis was also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 256 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157178</link>
      <description>Best-judgment turnover assessments for 1982-83 and 1983-84 were upheld where the assessee failed to maintain proper books and the estimating authority relied on disclosed expenditure and related outgoings without any jurisdictional error in the method adopted. Withdrawal of composition benefit for 1984-85 could not be sustained because cancellation under the sales tax rules required an independent finding of contravention on fresh material; reliance only on the inspection report, after the alleged offence had already been compounded under section 31, was insufficient. The consequential penalty resting on the same basis was also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>