<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 322 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157160</link>
    <description>Under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, a sale requires transfer of property in goods for cash, deferred payment, or other valuable consideration. The Kerala High Court applied the settled distinction between sale and exchange or barter, noting that the consideration must be monetary or equivalent to cash. On the facts, the absence of a stock register, the credit of interest in the purchase account, and the stipulation for interest indicated that the arrangement was not a genuine loan but a deferred-price transaction. The surrounding circumstances showed that the goods transaction was not a mere bailment or loan and was treated as taxable turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 322 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157160</link>
      <description>Under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, a sale requires transfer of property in goods for cash, deferred payment, or other valuable consideration. The Kerala High Court applied the settled distinction between sale and exchange or barter, noting that the consideration must be monetary or equivalent to cash. On the facts, the absence of a stock register, the credit of interest in the purchase account, and the stipulation for interest indicated that the arrangement was not a genuine loan but a deferred-price transaction. The surrounding circumstances showed that the goods transaction was not a mere bailment or loan and was treated as taxable turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>