<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 226 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157150</link>
    <description>A procedural lapse in denying cross-examination of a witness referred to in the remand order affected only the estimated addition made after rejection of the books; it did not justify annulment of the entire assessment. The conceded turnover stood independently admitted by the assessee and could not be displaced by that defect. The tribunal erred in treating the non-compliance as vitiating the full assessment, and the matter was confined to fresh consideration of the estimated component in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 226 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157150</link>
      <description>A procedural lapse in denying cross-examination of a witness referred to in the remand order affected only the estimated addition made after rejection of the books; it did not justify annulment of the entire assessment. The conceded turnover stood independently admitted by the assessee and could not be displaced by that defect. The tribunal erred in treating the non-compliance as vitiating the full assessment, and the matter was confined to fresh consideration of the estimated component in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>