<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 320 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157138</link>
    <description>Ambada oil was treated as an edible oil for tax classification under Entry No. 128 because the revisional authority&#039;s contrary view was unsupported by material. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Commissioner, Sales Tax clarification and the Director of Industries&#039; opinion was accepted as supporting the edible-oil classification. In the absence of evidence to sustain the revisional authority&#039;s finding, the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was held free from illegality and the tax revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 320 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157138</link>
      <description>Ambada oil was treated as an edible oil for tax classification under Entry No. 128 because the revisional authority&#039;s contrary view was unsupported by material. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Commissioner, Sales Tax clarification and the Director of Industries&#039; opinion was accepted as supporting the edible-oil classification. In the absence of evidence to sustain the revisional authority&#039;s finding, the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was held free from illegality and the tax revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>