<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 171 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157133</link>
    <description>Where the statutory scheme governing transport of goods contemplates delivery notes being issued in advance in book form, with regulated custody, registers, surrender of unused forms and invalidation of obsolete forms, an assessing authority cannot require a dealer to obtain a fresh note on each occasion. A mere apprehension of tax evasion is insufficient to justify selective denial of such forms when the Act and Rules already provide safeguards, and discriminatory refusal is inconsistent with Article 14. The dealer was therefore entitled to advance supply of delivery notes in book form, and the refusal to issue them was not legally justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 171 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157133</link>
      <description>Where the statutory scheme governing transport of goods contemplates delivery notes being issued in advance in book form, with regulated custody, registers, surrender of unused forms and invalidation of obsolete forms, an assessing authority cannot require a dealer to obtain a fresh note on each occasion. A mere apprehension of tax evasion is insufficient to justify selective denial of such forms when the Act and Rules already provide safeguards, and discriminatory refusal is inconsistent with Article 14. The dealer was therefore entitled to advance supply of delivery notes in book form, and the refusal to issue them was not legally justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>