<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 345 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157128</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court affirmed the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case where the assessee acted as an agent for license holders in importing goods. The Court held that the sales were in the course of import and exempt from sales tax, as the assessee facilitated the import process for the license holders. The Court ruled in favor of the dealer, answering both questions in the affirmative and upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:24:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 345 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157128</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court affirmed the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case where the assessee acted as an agent for license holders in importing goods. The Court held that the sales were in the course of import and exempt from sales tax, as the assessee facilitated the import process for the license holders. The Court ruled in favor of the dealer, answering both questions in the affirmative and upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>