<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157126</link>
    <description>Goods despatched from Madras pursuant to contracts with buyers in other States were treated as inter-State sales, because the movement of goods was linked to the purchase transactions and the authorities found that the claim of branch transfers was unsupported. The assessee&#039;s alternative plea for relief on the footing that the same turnover had already suffered sales tax in other States also failed, as there was no assessment order or reliable material proving prior taxation of the same goods, and the affidavit relied on was vague and based on the same incorrect assumption. The revisional challenge therefore failed and the Tribunal&#039;s order stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157126</link>
      <description>Goods despatched from Madras pursuant to contracts with buyers in other States were treated as inter-State sales, because the movement of goods was linked to the purchase transactions and the authorities found that the claim of branch transfers was unsupported. The assessee&#039;s alternative plea for relief on the footing that the same turnover had already suffered sales tax in other States also failed, as there was no assessment order or reliable material proving prior taxation of the same goods, and the affidavit relied on was vague and based on the same incorrect assumption. The revisional challenge therefore failed and the Tribunal&#039;s order stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>