<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 337 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157110</link>
    <description>A taxing entry using the unqualified expression &quot;silk yarn&quot; was interpreted in its ordinary and generic commercial sense, because the statutory context showed that the legislature distinguished between &quot;pure silk&quot; and &quot;artificial silk&quot; where a narrower meaning was intended. The HC held that the broader wording could not be restricted by implication, and distinguished authorities dealing with different entries and contexts. Artificial silk yarn was therefore included within &quot;silk yarn&quot; and fell within the tax-free schedule, with the assessee held not liable to sales tax under the disputed entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:23:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 337 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157110</link>
      <description>A taxing entry using the unqualified expression &quot;silk yarn&quot; was interpreted in its ordinary and generic commercial sense, because the statutory context showed that the legislature distinguished between &quot;pure silk&quot; and &quot;artificial silk&quot; where a narrower meaning was intended. The HC held that the broader wording could not be restricted by implication, and distinguished authorities dealing with different entries and contexts. Artificial silk yarn was therefore included within &quot;silk yarn&quot; and fell within the tax-free schedule, with the assessee held not liable to sales tax under the disputed entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>