<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 480 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157098</link>
    <description>Renewal of charter/lease permits was denied under a changed Government policy prohibiting renewal/extension, raising issues of legitimate expectation/promissory estoppel and the reasonableness of the restriction. The SC held that while renewal is a valuable right, it can be refused for overriding public interest, and neither legitimate expectation nor promissory estoppel can compel renewal against a conscious policy decision absent statutory compulsion; public interest prevails over private interest. The SC further held that reasonableness must be judged objectively from the standpoint of general public interest, and a restriction is not unreasonable merely because it operates harshly. Consequently, the HC&#039;s direction to consider renewal as contrary to statute was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 00:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 480 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157098</link>
      <description>Renewal of charter/lease permits was denied under a changed Government policy prohibiting renewal/extension, raising issues of legitimate expectation/promissory estoppel and the reasonableness of the restriction. The SC held that while renewal is a valuable right, it can be refused for overriding public interest, and neither legitimate expectation nor promissory estoppel can compel renewal against a conscious policy decision absent statutory compulsion; public interest prevails over private interest. The SC further held that reasonableness must be judged objectively from the standpoint of general public interest, and a restriction is not unreasonable merely because it operates harshly. Consequently, the HC&#039;s direction to consider renewal as contrary to statute was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>