<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 170 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157089</link>
    <description>The notification on dry or preserved fruit was confined by the words &quot;that is to say&quot; to fruit or the edible part of fruit that has undergone preserving treatment. Raw cashewnut seed, including the whole seed before kernel extraction, was held outside that class because it contains non-edible and poisonous portions and is commercially and functionally distinct from edible fruit. The inclusive reference to cashewnut did not enlarge the entry beyond the specified category, and noscitur a sociis supported the contextual reading. Accordingly, raw cashewnut seed was not a notified commodity under either part of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:09:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 170 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157089</link>
      <description>The notification on dry or preserved fruit was confined by the words &quot;that is to say&quot; to fruit or the edible part of fruit that has undergone preserving treatment. Raw cashewnut seed, including the whole seed before kernel extraction, was held outside that class because it contains non-edible and poisonous portions and is commercially and functionally distinct from edible fruit. The inclusive reference to cashewnut did not enlarge the entry beyond the specified category, and noscitur a sociis supported the contextual reading. Accordingly, raw cashewnut seed was not a notified commodity under either part of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>