https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157063 Section 29B of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 was treated as wide enough to permit exemption of a scheduled industry when the Central Government considers continued application of the Act against the public interest. The Court noted that the Act disclosed the legislative policy and the grounds for exemption, so the power was not invalid for excessive delegation. In economic and industrial regulation, judicial review remains limited to illegality, unconstitutionality, mala fides, or patent arbitrariness. On that basis, de-licensing of the sugar industry through notification and press note was regarded as a lawful exercise of executive policy without need for legislative amendment or parliamentary approval. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157063 Section 29B of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 was treated as wide enough to permit exemption of a scheduled industry when the Central Government considers continued application of the Act against the public interest. The Court noted that the Act disclosed the legislative policy and the grounds for exemption, so the power was not invalid for excessive delegation. In economic and industrial regulation, judicial review remains limited to illegality, unconstitutionality, mala fides, or patent arbitrariness. On that basis, de-licensing of the sugar industry through notification and press note was regarded as a lawful exercise of executive policy without need for legislative amendment or parliamentary approval. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157063