<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157058</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, except for W.P. No. 7131 of 1991, which was partly allowed with directions for fresh assessment. The court upheld the inclusion of additional sales tax and surcharge in the rate of tax under the Central Sales Tax Act and provided directions for the petitioners to file objections and pursue statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 13:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157058</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, except for W.P. No. 7131 of 1991, which was partly allowed with directions for fresh assessment. The court upheld the inclusion of additional sales tax and surcharge in the rate of tax under the Central Sales Tax Act and provided directions for the petitioners to file objections and pursue statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>