<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 288 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157050</link>
    <description>In the absence of a statutory definition, fiscal classification turns on the popular or commercial meaning of the goods rather than their scientific composition. A product marketed and used as detergent soap was treated as soap because it was understood in trade and consumer parlance as a washing and cleaning agent, and its functional character outweighed the absence of a substantial soap base. A later amendment adding detergents to the soap entry did not control the pre-amendment position, but it did not exclude detergent soap from the ordinary meaning of soap. Accordingly, the product fell within the soap entry and not the residuary detergent entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 13:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 288 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157050</link>
      <description>In the absence of a statutory definition, fiscal classification turns on the popular or commercial meaning of the goods rather than their scientific composition. A product marketed and used as detergent soap was treated as soap because it was understood in trade and consumer parlance as a washing and cleaning agent, and its functional character outweighed the absence of a substantial soap base. A later amendment adding detergents to the soap entry did not control the pre-amendment position, but it did not exclude detergent soap from the ordinary meaning of soap. Accordingly, the product fell within the soap entry and not the residuary detergent entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>