<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 285 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157023</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 5-A(2)(iii) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act applies where industrial inputs purchased on Form 37 declaration are in fact used to manufacture exempt goods, because the penal provision must be read with the concessional input scheme in section 5-A(1) and is triggered when the declared purpose is defeated. The expression &quot;makes use of&quot; was held broad enough to cover use in the manufacture of HDPE fabrics, which are exempt textiles, even though HDPE tapes were an intermediate stage. However, HDPE sacks produced from the fabrics were taxable goods, so no penalty could be levied to the extent the inputs were used in the chain leading to the sacks. The penalty was therefore required to be reduced proportionately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:16:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 285 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157023</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 5-A(2)(iii) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act applies where industrial inputs purchased on Form 37 declaration are in fact used to manufacture exempt goods, because the penal provision must be read with the concessional input scheme in section 5-A(1) and is triggered when the declared purpose is defeated. The expression &quot;makes use of&quot; was held broad enough to cover use in the manufacture of HDPE fabrics, which are exempt textiles, even though HDPE tapes were an intermediate stage. However, HDPE sacks produced from the fabrics were taxable goods, so no penalty could be levied to the extent the inputs were used in the chain leading to the sacks. The penalty was therefore required to be reduced proportionately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>