<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 202 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157010</link>
    <description>Discretionary sales tax penalty proceedings must be initiated within a reasonable time even where no limitation period is prescribed; unexplained long delay can vitiate the orders. The offence under section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act requires mens rea, because &quot;falsely represents&quot; imports a deceptive and dishonest state of mind, not mere negligence or technical error. A transferee of business is not vicariously liable for the transferor&#039;s penalty under section 10A, and section 26 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act does not extend &quot;other amount&quot; to such penalty. The unamended registration certificate objection failed, and writ relief was maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 202 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157010</link>
      <description>Discretionary sales tax penalty proceedings must be initiated within a reasonable time even where no limitation period is prescribed; unexplained long delay can vitiate the orders. The offence under section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act requires mens rea, because &quot;falsely represents&quot; imports a deceptive and dishonest state of mind, not mere negligence or technical error. A transferee of business is not vicariously liable for the transferor&#039;s penalty under section 10A, and section 26 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act does not extend &quot;other amount&quot; to such penalty. The unamended registration certificate objection failed, and writ relief was maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>