https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156998 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, objections to the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement are ordinarily to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not examined in detail by the civil court at the stage of injunctive relief. The tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, and a party should raise such objections before it, particularly where the party has already participated in the reference. The text also explains that a clear exclusive jurisdiction clause confining disputes to Bombay courts can validly exclude other competent courts, so a restraint order from the Calcutta court was unsustainable where territorial jurisdiction was excluded. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156998 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, objections to the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement are ordinarily to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not examined in detail by the civil court at the stage of injunctive relief. The tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, and a party should raise such objections before it, particularly where the party has already participated in the reference. The text also explains that a clear exclusive jurisdiction clause confining disputes to Bombay courts can validly exclude other competent courts, so a restraint order from the Calcutta court was unsustainable where territorial jurisdiction was excluded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156998