<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 610 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156994</link>
    <description>Fraud and suppression of material facts render a decree a nullity, and res judicata cannot be used to protect an order procured by deliberate deception. The court may exercise inherent jurisdiction to recall or set aside such an order. A consent order, though judicially sanctioned, cannot extinguish rights already acquired by a non-party auction purchaser or defeat vested third-party rights created independently of the compromise. The effect of a confirmed auction sale must be considered before giving effect to any review or compromise, and equitable adjustment may be required where the court&#039;s own order would otherwise prejudice an innocent third party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 610 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156994</link>
      <description>Fraud and suppression of material facts render a decree a nullity, and res judicata cannot be used to protect an order procured by deliberate deception. The court may exercise inherent jurisdiction to recall or set aside such an order. A consent order, though judicially sanctioned, cannot extinguish rights already acquired by a non-party auction purchaser or defeat vested third-party rights created independently of the compromise. The effect of a confirmed auction sale must be considered before giving effect to any review or compromise, and equitable adjustment may be required where the court&#039;s own order would otherwise prejudice an innocent third party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>