<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 530 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156993</link>
    <description>A contractual forum-selection clause is enforceable when it chooses one among multiple courts that already have jurisdiction, but it cannot create jurisdiction where none exists. Reading the consignment note together with Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Court found that the wording clearly and specifically selected Udaipur as the exclusive forum and excluded other competent courts. The clause was therefore valid, and Barnala lacked jurisdiction. The appeal succeeded and the High Court judgment was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 530 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156993</link>
      <description>A contractual forum-selection clause is enforceable when it chooses one among multiple courts that already have jurisdiction, but it cannot create jurisdiction where none exists. Reading the consignment note together with Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Court found that the wording clearly and specifically selected Udaipur as the exclusive forum and excluded other competent courts. The clause was therefore valid, and Barnala lacked jurisdiction. The appeal succeeded and the High Court judgment was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>