https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156989 A disciplinary rule permitting inquiry by the authority itself, a Board of Inquiry, or "other authority" was held to be broad enough to include a retired railway officer, because the phrase was not restricted to serving employees and no express or implied exclusion applied. The Court also held that ejusdem generis did not confine the expression to in-service personnel, so the inquiry appointment was valid. On the vigilance issue, non-furnishing of CVC advice or notes did not vitiate the punishment because no statutory rule made supply mandatory and no actual prejudice was shown. The disciplinary proceedings were therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156989 A disciplinary rule permitting inquiry by the authority itself, a Board of Inquiry, or "other authority" was held to be broad enough to include a retired railway officer, because the phrase was not restricted to serving employees and no express or implied exclusion applied. The Court also held that ejusdem generis did not confine the expression to in-service personnel, so the inquiry appointment was valid. On the vigilance issue, non-furnishing of CVC advice or notes did not vitiate the punishment because no statutory rule made supply mandatory and no actual prejudice was shown. The disciplinary proceedings were therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156989