<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 259 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156978</link>
    <description>Packing charges incurred before sale or delivery formed part of taxable turnover, so deduction under rule 6(4)(ff) was unavailable because that provision applied only to post-sale or post-delivery packing expenses. On liquor sold with bottles, amended entry 38 did not create a legal fiction treating separate sales of contents and containers as one composite sale; the transaction had to be examined on its facts, including separate agreements and pricing. The chemical fertilizer mixture issue was governed by the earlier Full Bench ruling and had to be reassessed accordingly, so the assessments were set aside and remitted for fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:00:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 259 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156978</link>
      <description>Packing charges incurred before sale or delivery formed part of taxable turnover, so deduction under rule 6(4)(ff) was unavailable because that provision applied only to post-sale or post-delivery packing expenses. On liquor sold with bottles, amended entry 38 did not create a legal fiction treating separate sales of contents and containers as one composite sale; the transaction had to be examined on its facts, including separate agreements and pricing. The chemical fertilizer mixture issue was governed by the earlier Full Bench ruling and had to be reassessed accordingly, so the assessments were set aside and remitted for fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>