<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 894 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156977</link>
    <description>Signboards on petrol-pump poles projecting over the pavement and visible from the street were treated as falling within the scope of Section 328(3) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The provision was read as inclusive and aimed at regulating sky-signs and related installations that may affect traffic flow, public space, ecology and safety. The expressions &quot;advertisement&quot;, &quot;announcement&quot; and &quot;direction&quot; were construed in their ordinary contextual sense and not confined to commercial solicitation. Ejusdem generis and noscitur a sociis were held not to narrow the provision unduly. The result was that the signboards were within the statutory mischief and subject to municipal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=174003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 894 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156977</link>
      <description>Signboards on petrol-pump poles projecting over the pavement and visible from the street were treated as falling within the scope of Section 328(3) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The provision was read as inclusive and aimed at regulating sky-signs and related installations that may affect traffic flow, public space, ecology and safety. The expressions &quot;advertisement&quot;, &quot;announcement&quot; and &quot;direction&quot; were construed in their ordinary contextual sense and not confined to commercial solicitation. Ejusdem generis and noscitur a sociis were held not to narrow the provision unduly. The result was that the signboards were within the statutory mischief and subject to municipal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>