<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 321 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156973</link>
    <description>A manufacturing arrangement for pre-stressed concrete poles was treated as a contract of sale rather than a works contract because the parties intended delivery of finished poles for a fixed price per pole, even though the board supplied cement and steel and the contractor provided labour and other inputs. The supply of board materials, return of surplus, and obligation to bear loss on rejected poles did not change the character of the transaction. Once the contract was held to be a sale, sales tax applied to the agreed contract price of the poles, and not merely to the net amount after deducting the value of the materials supplied by the board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 321 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156973</link>
      <description>A manufacturing arrangement for pre-stressed concrete poles was treated as a contract of sale rather than a works contract because the parties intended delivery of finished poles for a fixed price per pole, even though the board supplied cement and steel and the contractor provided labour and other inputs. The supply of board materials, return of surplus, and obligation to bear loss on rejected poles did not change the character of the transaction. Once the contract was held to be a sale, sales tax applied to the agreed contract price of the poles, and not merely to the net amount after deducting the value of the materials supplied by the board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>