<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 224 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156966</link>
    <description>An assessee claiming exemption on the basis of Form 25 declarations was protected where the purchasing dealers held valid registration certificates on the dates of the transactions. Subsequent retrospective cancellation of those certificates did not invalidate declarations already issued when the certificates were operative. On that reasoning, the exemption claim was upheld and the revisions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 224 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156966</link>
      <description>An assessee claiming exemption on the basis of Form 25 declarations was protected where the purchasing dealers held valid registration certificates on the dates of the transactions. Subsequent retrospective cancellation of those certificates did not invalidate declarations already issued when the certificates were operative. On that reasoning, the exemption claim was upheld and the revisions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>