<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 502 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156957</link>
    <description>SC dismissed civil appeal regarding interpretation of General Exemption No. 121 under Section 25(1) of Customs Act, 1962. Court held that while literal interpretation is preferred, it should be avoided when causing anomaly or absurdity, as Legislature intends to avoid hardship. Exemption notifications cannot be construed oppressively. However, authority delays don&#039;t automatically entitle refund - each case requires individual assessment. Public notices by Custom Houses cannot override statutory notifications; only the Board may issue instructions under Section 151A. Tribunal&#039;s decision to remit matter to Commissioner was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 502 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156957</link>
      <description>SC dismissed civil appeal regarding interpretation of General Exemption No. 121 under Section 25(1) of Customs Act, 1962. Court held that while literal interpretation is preferred, it should be avoided when causing anomaly or absurdity, as Legislature intends to avoid hardship. Exemption notifications cannot be construed oppressively. However, authority delays don&#039;t automatically entitle refund - each case requires individual assessment. Public notices by Custom Houses cannot override statutory notifications; only the Board may issue instructions under Section 151A. Tribunal&#039;s decision to remit matter to Commissioner was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>