<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 213 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156925</link>
    <description>Deduction from taxable turnover for sales to registered dealers was available only on production of the prescribed declaration form furnished by the purchasing dealer. Mere possession or later assertion of the declaration was insufficient, and the statutory condition could not be replaced by equity or other evidence. The prescribed form operated as a mandatory condition precedent to the deduction, so its absence or loss did not entitle the dealer to relief. On that basis, the claim for deduction failed and the assessment-related application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=173951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 213 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156925</link>
      <description>Deduction from taxable turnover for sales to registered dealers was available only on production of the prescribed declaration form furnished by the purchasing dealer. Mere possession or later assertion of the declaration was insufficient, and the statutory condition could not be replaced by equity or other evidence. The prescribed form operated as a mandatory condition precedent to the deduction, so its absence or loss did not entitle the dealer to relief. On that basis, the claim for deduction failed and the assessment-related application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=156925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>